Higher Ed. Pedagogy, Andragogy & Application
Saturday, December 26, 2009
  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Lessons Learned
In sum, many decisions were made about training development prior to developing any training content. The following lessons learned may be useful for future instructional designers developing distributed training:

  Link
Friday, December 25, 2009
  Merlot Pedagogy Portal

The MERLOT Pedagogy Portal is designed to help you learn about the variety of instructional strategies and issues that could help you become a better teacher. The resources you’ll find in the Pedagogy Portal should apply to teaching a variety of disciplines. This collection of resources should help you answer questions that teachers ask:

The resources highlighted in this portal are organized into 5 major areas which were developed by the MERLOT Faculty Development community after several years of exploring other categorization schemes. They correspond to the steps in the teaching process; each major area has specific topics for you to explore: 1. Learners and Learning, 2. Course, Instructional Design, 3. Teaching Strategies, 4. Teaching Challenges, 5. Assessment.

  Link
  Pedagogy and Online Learning

Resources Regarding Pedagogy and Online Learning, Instructional Strategies and Pedagogy (University Library, University of Illinois, Urbana, Champaign)

  Link
Thursday, December 24, 2009
  Evaluation and Application of Andragogical Assumptions to the Adult Online Learning Environment
116
Evaluation and Application of Andragogical Assumptions to the
Adult Online Learning Environment (2007)
Laurie C. Blondy
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
The usefulness and application of andragogical assumptions has long been debated by adult educators. The assumptions of andragogy are often criticized due to the lack of empirical evidence to support them, even though several educational theories are represented within the assumptions. In adult online education, these assumptions represent an ideal starting point for educators to use in their instructional approach. Application of these assumptions with respect to the type of course being taught and individual student needs can help create a learner centered approach to online education.
  Link
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
  John Dewey and Reflective Thinking (PPT)
PPT presentation on Dewey's learning 'philosophy'. Constructivist Learning Theory.
  Link
  Development of Reflective Thinking (Table)
Table provides a 'good and brief' outline of stages of reflective thinking.
  Link
  Adult Learning: Obstacles and Opportunities PPT (The Yellow-Brick Road, Model of Andragogy)
PPT from U of Phoenix
  Link
Monday, December 21, 2009
  My Other BLOG. Please Visit
Please visit my other weblog, E-learning, Practice and Research. Weekly posts on news and events re: E-learning.
  Link
Sunday, December 20, 2009
  Reflective Reasoning and Tolerance for Diversity in Undergraduate Students

The results of this research imply that efforts within higher education to develop and build students' reflective thinking ability both in and out of the classroom are likely to have an accompanying positive impact on their tolerance levels. Specific curricular and cocurricular interventions can develop students' reflective judgment abilities. It is important for higher education to employ intentional interventions to facilitate the development of reflective thinking as an important end goal in itself. However, based on the findings of this study, educators may also do so to develop the cognitive capability underlying tolerance. Given the difficulty of attributing causality, the converse may also be true: what educators do in the area of building tolerance might also help some students reach higher levels of reflective thinking ability.

Developing respect for human diversity by replacing racism, sexism, and ethnocentrism with an appreciation for racial, gender, and cultural differences is a common learning goal of college and university educators. Educators should intentionally point students toward curricular and cocurricular learning experiences that promote tolerance, especially those based on developmental principles.

This research underscores the need not only to offer intentionally designed learning experiences for college students that will foster tolerance for diversity, but also to guide and direct students to become involved in these activities purposefully as essential components of their higher education experience.

  Link
Friday, December 18, 2009
  Using Asynchronous Online Discussions in Blended Courses: Comparing Impacts Across Courses in Three Content Areas (for Traditional Undergraduates)
The challenge for instructors of blended courses who wish to use online discussions is to find ways to maximize the perceived relevance and/or value of the discussions. According to Xie, Debacker, and Ferguson (2006), when students perceive online discussions as relevant, interesting, and enjoyable their value increases. In this study, the engineering students put the highest value of the online discussions on content learning. This result certainly reflects the way that the discussions were used in the engineering course (e.g., to help students with content problems and for exam preparation) as well as the culture in engineering which puts a premium on problem-solving and getting the right answer. On the other hand, the English education and educational technology students in this study rated the ability to express opinions and participate most highly, and this is consistent with the nature of these disciplines. Achieving concordance between purposes of the online discussion and the goals of the course obviously is important. So, instructors of blended courses should seek to use online discussions in ways that fit the discipline and content.
  Link
  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education (Chickering and Gamson)
Apathetic students, illiterate graduates, incompetent teaching, impersonal campuses -- so rolls the drumfire of criticism of higher education. More than two years of reports have spelled out the problems. States have been quick to respond by holding out carrots and beating with sticks.

There are neither enough carrots nor enough sticks to improve undergraduate education without the commitment and action of students and faculty members. They are the precious resources on whom the improvement of undergraduate education depends.

But how can students and faculty members improve undergraduate education? Many campuses around the country are asking this question. To provide a focus for their work, we offer seven principles based on research on good teaching and learning in colleges and universities.

Good practice in undergraduate education:

  1. encourages contact between students and faculty,
  2. develops reciprocity and cooperation among students,
  3. encourages active learning,
  4. gives prompt feedback,
  5. emphasizes time on task,
  6. communicates high expectations, and
  7. respects diverse talents and ways of learning.
  Link
  Andragogy and Online Teaching (PPT)
PPT . . .repeats some of the most important principles underlying androgogy, compares and contrast to pedagogy.
  Link
  Andrological and Pedagogical Training Differences for Online Instructors
The nature of the online learner suggests that online instructor training be based on andragogical theory. This theory is anchored in five assumptive differences between pedagogy and andragogy. 2001 Best Paper . . .Conf. Proceedings. (Chart provided)
  Link
  R2D2 Model for Online Learning
i, Dec 11, 2009 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
R2D2: A model for using technology in education
'Read, Reflect, Display, and Do' can help instructors leverage the internet's potential to help students learn
  Link
  Learning Sciences Program at Northwestern . School of Ed . and Social Policy

The School of Education and Social Policy offers two graduate degrees in Learning Sciences, the
MA and the PhD. Both degree programs are dedicated to the preparation of researchers, developers and practitioners qualified to advance the scientific understanding and practice of teaching and learning. The goal of research and development efforts of the Learning Sciences is to develop pedagogical, technological and social policy innovations aimed at improving education. Rather than just studying innovation, course work and research, the Learning Sciences programs emphasize both the design and implementation of learning environments with a reform agenda.
  Link
  Andragogy and Technology
This is an older paper, but is still relevant in terms of both student and faculty intent, motivation and course construction.
  Link
Posts in this weblog deal with teaching and learning in tertiary institutions.Fundamentally: this weblog deals with research and information in the areas of pedagogy, andragogy and practice and is intended for educational and non-commercial use and purposes only. (If what you are looking for is not on the homepage, check out the archives.)

My Photo
Name: Roger Goodson
Location: Belmont, Bay Area/California, United States

University Professor with practice and research interests in transforming higher education as well as in e-learning, organizational learning and development.

ARCHIVES
April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / May 2007 / June 2007 / September 2007 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / November 2009 / December 2009 /


Powered by Blogger

link to www.sloanconsortium.org